Recent federal court action and a new USCIS interim rule have altered certain asylum-related procedures and compliance requirements for applicants, employers, and legal representatives. A federal court has temporarily stayed specific USCIS policies related to the implementation of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act while litigation remains pending. The order pauses the application of certain Temporary Protected Status (TPS)-based Employment Authorization Document (EAD) expiration provisions and temporarily stays the implementation of certain USCIS policies tied to the Annual Asylum Fee (AAF), including asylum application rejections, termination of work authorization, and removal proceedings based solely on non-payment. However, the court expressly allows USCIS to continue collecting the AAF, and all other statutory requirements remain in effect. USCIS has also confirmed that it will comply with the court’s order and provide updated guidance as further judicial proceedings unfold.

In a separate procedural update, USCIS announced an interim final rule aimed at reducing the growing asylum backlog. Under this rule, USCIS may refer certain asylum applications to an Immigration Judge without first interviewing the applicant. The procedural change is intended to streamline case processing and reduce the time required for adjudication across both USCIS and immigration court systems. By modifying the existing review process, USCIS seeks to improve administrative efficiency while directing adjudicative resources toward timely resolution of pending asylum claims. The rule took effect immediately on July 27, 2026, with the agency continuing to accept public comments before issuing a final rule responding to those comments.

For asylum applicants, employers reviewing affected TPS-based work authorization, and legal representatives, these developments reinforce the importance of closely monitoring ongoing regulatory and judicial actions. These procedural updates may affect case timelines or compliance responsibilities. Individual applicants should continue following official USCIS instructions, including fee payment obligations where applicable, while remaining aware that certain policies remain subject to judicial review. Employers should also review the validity periods of affected TPS-based EADs when completing or updating employment-verification records. As additional guidance becomes available, stakeholders should evaluate its legal and procedural implications to support informed immigration planning and case management.

Explore more:

USCIS Announces Rule Change to Asylum System to Reduce Backlog | USCIS

Court Issues Administrative Stay of Certain USCIS Policies | USCIS

20250821-SubmissionOfFees.pdf